CYC-Net

CYC-Net on Facebook CYC-Net on Twitter Search CYC-Net

Join Our Mailing List

Quote

Just a short piece ...

NO 1667

Cognitive Behaviour Therapy

The mental health needs of children and adolescents have become an issue of grave concern worldwide. Recent evidence compiled by the World Health Organization indicates that by the year 2020 childhood neuropsychiatric disorders will increase by over 50% internationally, to become one of the five most common causes of morbidity, mortality, and disability among children (US Public Health Service, 2000).

In the school setting, children who exhibit moderate to severe emotional and behaviour disorders (EBD) are primarily served in special classes characterized by a high degree of structure (i.e., rules are clear and consistently reinforced) and teacher monitoring (Morgan & Ienson, 1988). Comprehensive behaviour management systems are in place to shape and encourage prosocial behaviours and to decrease inappropriate behaviours. However, for children with very severe EBD, more intensive therapy, individual attention, and close monitoring are required, typically beyond what an educational psychologist or counsellor could provide in the regular and special education settings. For this group of children with chronic and severe psychological disturbance, focused treatment in a more restrictive setting (e.g., hospital school or day treatment) is needed before they can function within the regular or special school system. Mental health professionals, therefore, need to determine interventions that are effective for troubled children who need more intensive support.

Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) has shown good promise for children and adolescents with emotional and disruptive behaviour disorders. Anchored in behavioural and cognitive research and theory (Kendall, Panichelli-Mindell, & Gerow, 1995), it focuses on altering behaviour by changing thought processes and environmental reinforcement. CBT includes training in cognitive restructuring or positive self-talk (Meichenbaum, 1977), problem-solving skills (D’Zurilla & Goldfried, 1971; Spivack & Shure, 1976), and anxiety management (Suinn & Richardson, 1971). In addition to changing cognition, effort is made to shape the environment in ways that will reinforce desired behaviours. Hence, CBT is a skill-building therapeutic approach (Kendall et al., 1995) with the potential for promoting deep, internal change.

CBT has been used extensively with encouraging outcomes in the school setting for children with EBD. Self-instructional training significantly lowered impulsive responding on academic tasks (Meichenbaum & Goodman, 1971), increased on- task behaviour and locus of control (Manning, 1988), and reduced anger and aggression (Smith, Siegel, O’Connor, & Thomas, 1994) for school children who manifested hyperactivity/impulsivity or mild behaviour problems. A problem-solving approach to anger management led to significant improvement in self-control and reduction of physical aggression for children who were chronically disruptive, aggressive, and impulsive (Etscheidt, 1991; Lochman & Curry, 1986). Stress inoculation training raised self-esteem and reduced trait anxiety and anger in adolescent boys who needed help in stress management (Hains & Szyjakowski, 1990).

However, the literature on the effectiveness of CBT for treating severe EBD in a hospital and/or clinic setting is very limited albeit positive. In day treatment type settings, verbal mediation (i.e., self—talk) has been found to produce positive and durable outcomes for a group of impulsive and emotionally disturbed adolescents (Baum, Clark, McCarthy, Sandler, & Carpenter, 1986) and children with anxiety or . phobic disorders in a School Refusal Clinic (King et al., 1998). In inpatient hospitalization programmes where children were being treated for severe anti-social behaviours or Conduct Disorder, problem-solving skills training led to positive outcomes such as a significant increase in prosocial behaviours (Kazdin, Bass, Siegel, & Thomas. 1989) and reduction of depressive symptoms (Roberts, Schmitz, Pinto, & Cain, 1990).

Most studies involving EBD youths in mental health settings have focused on predominantly psychodynamic treatments (Grizenko, 1997; Grizenko, Papineau, & Savegh, 1993; Grizenko, Savegh, & Papineau, 1994; Kettlewell, Iones, & Iones, 1985; Kiser et al., 1996; Kotsopoulos, Walker, Beggs, & Iones, 1996). A consisistent finding that emerged is that a largely psychodynamic multimodal treatment is not effective for children with severe behaviour disorders or conduct disorders even when interventions are delivered in a hospital setting intensively over an extended length of time (Kazdin, 1985; Kettlewell et al., 1985; Kiser et al., 1996; Zoccolillo & Rogers, 1991).

In light of the limited CBT research involving emotionally disturbed children and adolescents, this study evaluated the outcome of a hospital-based CBT programme for a group of youths who were receiving intensive psychotherapy for very severe EBD. We examined the extent to which the youths irriproved in global psychological functioning and day-to-day adjustment. We also evaluated whether the benefits would be maintained over a three-month period.

Lay See Yeo, Margaret Wong, Kathryn Gerken & Timothy Ansley

Yeo, L.S., Wong, M., Gerken, K. and Ansley, T. (2005) Cognitive-behavioural Therapy in a Hospital Setting for Children with Severe Emotional and/or Behaviour Disorders. Child Care in Practice, 11 (1), pp.7-9

References

Baum, I. G., Clark, H. B., McCarthy, W., Sandler, I., 8c Carpenter, R. (1986). An analysis of the acquisition and generalization of social skills in troubled youths: Combining social skills training, cognitive self-talk, and relaxation procedures. Child and Family Behaviour Therapy, 8 (4), 1-27.

D’Zurilla, T. I., 8: Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behaviour modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78, 107-126.

Etscheidt, S. (1991). Reducing aggressive behaviour and improving self-control: A cognitive- behavioural training programme for behaviourally disordered adolescents. Behavioural Disorders, 16(2), 107-115.

Grizenko, N. (1997). Outcome of a multimodal day treatment for children with severe behaviour problems: A Five-Year follow-up. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 989-997.

Grizenko, N., Papineau, D., & Savegh, L. (1993). A comparison of day treatment and outpatient treatment for children with disruptive behaviour problem. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 38, 432-435.

Grizenko, N., Savegh, L., & Papineau, D. (1994). Predicting outcome in a multimodal day treatment·" programme for children with severe behaviour problems. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 557-562.

Hains, A. A., & Szyjakowski, M. (1990). A cognitive stress-reduction intervention programme for adolescents. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 37 (1), 79-84.

Kazdin, A. E. (1985). Treatment of antisocial behaviour in children and adolescents. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

Kazdin, A. E., Bass, D., Siegel, T., & Thomas, C. (1989). Cognitive—behavioural therapy and relationship therapy in the treatment of children referred for antisocial behaviour. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(4), 522-535.

Kendall, P C., Panichelli-Mindell, S. M., & Gerow, M. A. (1995). Cognitive-behavioural therapies with children and adolescents. An integrative overview. In H. P. van Bilsen, P. C. Kendall,, & I.H. Slavenburg (Eds.), Behavioural approaches for children and adolescents. New York: Plenum Press.

Kettlewell, P. W, Jones, I. K., & Jones, H. I. (1985). Adolescent partial hospitalization: Some preliminary outcome. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 14(2), 139-144.

King, N. I., Tonge, B. I., Heyne, D., Pritchard, M., Rollings, S., Young, D., Myerson, N., 8: Ollendick, T. (1998). Cognitive-behavioural treatment of school-refusing children: A controlled evaluation. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 37(4), 395-402.

Kiser, L. I., Millsap, R A., Heston, I. D., Nunn, W., Pruitt, D. B., & Rohr, M. (1996). Results of treatment one year later: Child and adolescent partial hospitalization. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(1), 81-90.

Kotsopoulos, S., Walker, S., Beggs, K., & Iones, B. (1996). A clinical and academic outcome study of children attending a day treatment programme. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 41, 371- 378.

Lochman, I. E., & Curry, I. F. (1986). Effects of social problem-solving training and self—instruction with aggressive boys. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 15, 159-164.

Manning, B. H. (1988). Application of cognitive-behavioural modification: First and third grader’s self—management of classroom behaviours. American Educational Research Journal, 25 (2), 193-212.

Meichenbaum, D. H. (1977). Cognitive-behavioural moddication: An integrative approach. New York: Plenum Press.

Meichenbaum, D. H., & Goodman, I. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77, 127-132.

Morgan, D. P., & Jenson, W R. (1988). Teaching behaviorally disordered students. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Roberts, G., Schmitz, K., Pinto, I., & Cain, S. (1990). The MMPI and Iesness Inventory as measures of effectiveness on an inpatient conduct disorders treatment unit. Adolescence, XXV(100), 989-996.

Smith, S. W., Siegel, E. M., O’ Connor, A. M., & Thomas, S. B. (1994). Effects of cognitive- behavioural training on angry behaviour and aggression of three elementary-aged students. Behavioural Disorders, 19(2), 126-135.

Spivack, G., & Shure, M. B. (1976). The problem-solving approach to adjustment. San Francisco: Josey—Bass.

Suinn, R.M. & Richardson, F. (1971). Anxiety management training: A non-speciic behaviour therapy programme for nxiety control. Behaviour Therapy, 2, 498-510.

Zoccolillo, M. & Rogers, K. (1991). Characteristics and outcome of hospitalized adolescent girls with conduct disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child abd Adolescent Psychiatry, 30(6), 973-981

The International Child and Youth Care Network
THE INTERNATIONAL CHILD AND YOUTH CARE NETWORK (CYC-Net)

Registered Public Benefit Organisation in the Republic of South Africa (PBO 930015296)
Incorporated as a Not-for-Profit in Canada: Corporation Number 1284643-8

P.O. Box 23199, Claremont 7735, Cape Town, South Africa | P.O. Box 21464, MacDonald Drive, St. John's, NL A1A 5G6, Canada

Board of Governors | Constitution | Funding | Site Content and Usage | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Contact us

iOS App Android App