and reach thousands of daily visitors
Since it's founding in 1997, the CYC-Net discussion group has been asked thousands of questions. These questions often generate many replies from people in all spheres of the Child and Youth Care profession and contain personal experiences, viewpoints, as well as recommended resources.
Below are some of the threads of discussions on varying Child and Youth Care related topics.
Questions and Responses have been reproduced verbatim.
Listen to thisCould someone kindly explain the difference
between counter transference and projective identifications?
Many thanks
J. Barret
...
Let me give it a try....
Transference is a universal tendency (according to psychodynamic theory) for
all people to project issues from their past onto their current significant
others. Essentially (in lay terms) we expect people in our present lives to
behave the way we were treated as children...so we respond accordingly.
Countertransference is when a helper projects their personal issues onto
their clients ... same exact mechanism.
Projective identification is a primitive defense in which someone induces in
another person the feelings they are struggling with. In a sense, they
communicate their feelings nonverbally and evacuate them by provoking the
same feelings in someone else. They dont feel them anymore but you do.
Where countertransference and projective identification meet, is when a
client is able to induce feelings in the helper that trigger them, but the
feelings are actually NOT a projection from the helpers past but a form of
communication where the helpees feelings are put into the helper.
The only way to know the difference is through a lot of soul searching
around our feelings with our clients...is this my issue or theirs?
Supervision helps a lot, because by definition we are never aware of these
mechanisms when they are happening.
Good luck with this! It's heady stuff!
Varda R. Mann-Feder
Montreal
...
JB: Both countertransference (CT) and projective identification (PI) have
numerous definitions. Increasingly, CT has come to mean the array of
emotional reactions that are evoked in our work with clients: anger (and
even hate), love, guilt, despair, etc. Some of this might be
considered a rational response to various events (anger at a client who
threatens you) and some might have more to do with one's personal issues
(i.e. a client who reminds you of a family member).
PI is a phenomenon that evokes CT responses. The way I like to
conceptualize it as a sort of an interpersonal re-dramatization of one's
intrapsychic life. For example, a client (unconsciously) pushes the
therapist's "buttons" which gets him/her to act as if he/she were the
client's (i.e. nagging) mother. This certainly happens in non-clinical
situations (friendships, workplace, marriages, etc) as well. It can be
worth reflecting on this if you find yourself acting (often repetitively) in
a pattern of behavior vis a vis a given client which seems unproductive.
One can ask: is the client somehow enlisting you in
recreating an interpersonal drama from his/her past? Note: it is
usually a bad idea to interpret this with clients; however, the simple act
of reflecting on this can be useful.
I have an article which addresses issue of compassion fatigue and
countertransference which is available online at
www.clarewinnicott.net.
See the link for "clinical applications" and the article "compassion
fatigue".
Good luck,
Joel Kanter
Silver Spring, Maryland
...
Many thanks for the replies – it has made it much clearer for me :-)
Regards JB
