Residential Child Care Workers as Primary Agents of Family Intervention
	Diane Richmond Garland
	There are several guidelines – strategies – which will move an agency 
	into a new model of family intervention: 
	
		- Draw the family generation line so that the child care worker is a 
	partner with the parents (Minuchin, 1974). Children will do to this 
	relationship what they do to any set of parents – try to manipulate one 
	against the other. Parents and child care workers need to understand this 
	and develop communication to correct misunderstandings and clarify 
	differences without being driven apart. This can, in turn, become a 
	significant model of the kind of communication which needs to occur within 
	the family itself.
 
		- Expect parents to become frequent, active participants in the life of 
	the agency – to become “family members” with rights and responsibilities, 
	not just visitors. Keith-Lucas (1977) has said that the chief danger we face 
	is halfway believing parents and letting them believe that infrequent 
	visits, letters, and broken promises are better than nothing at all. Parents 
	must either accept the parental role or give it up so that other permanent 
	arrangements for a family for the child can be made. Although this sounds 
	harsh, it is less harsh than the reality of a child stuck in the limbo of 
	residential care with no substantial hope of living with a family. Fanshel 
	and Shin (1978) report, not surprisingly, that the amount of parental 
	involvement increases the probability of the child’s return home.
 
		- Expect parents to have parenting responsibilities in the cottage or 
	living unit. These must be spelled out clearly so that parents, child care 
	workers, and children know what is and is not expected of parents. These 
	responsibilities include interaction with their own and other children, 
	discipline, and making decisions about school issues, clothing, and other 
	matters. The fulfillment of these responsibilities enables parents to 
	develop their parenting skills with the support and guidance of the staff in 
	a variety of kinds of family interaction. In a child care agency where 
	parents of placed children have almost unlimited visiting privileges, 
	evaluation indicates that parents with “severe problems” can increase, 
	sustain, and improve their parenting (Simmons, Gumpert, and Rothman, 1973). 
	In another program, the goal of parental involvement is for parents to learn 
	from and with the child care workers how to communicate more productively 
	with the children. “Parents learn how to take charge of the youngsters, and 
	how to evaluate intervention options” (Finkelstein, 1981; p. 97).
 
		- Actively encourage parents to interact with other children in 
	placement as well as with their own. Interacting with another child than 
	their own may be less emotionally charged and thus an appropriate place to 
	practice skills such as listening and communicating empathy.
 
		- Do not expect children care workers to model perfect parenting skills. 
	It is comforting to parents to realize that all parents and even 
	“professionals” make mistakes. Also, by recognizing that they are not 
	supposed to be perfect models, child care workers are free to model all the 
	attitudes and skills of good parenting – which include forgiveness of 
	children and self. For the child care worker and other professional 
	staff, greater parent involvement means, at least initially, a loss of 
	“superperson” status. Parents come to see that child care workers, social 
	workers and other clinical staff do not have all the answers, do have 
	problems dealing with difficult behavior, do make mistakes and, at times, 
	lose their cool with children. In short, they come to see them as more 
	human, more like themselves (Whittaker, 1981; p. 80).
		
 
		- Include parents in planning for their own children and or activities 
	and changes in the agency as well as in the living group. This entails 
	including parents in staff meetings which concern their children. It also 
	may mean the establishment or nurturing of a parent organization which can 
	be represented in the agency’s decision making. By including parents in 
	planning, responsibility rests where it belongs and underscores the 
	importance of parents in the lives of their children and of the agency.
 
		- Include parents in special projects – painting, group entertainment, 
	field trips, furnishing a recreation room. Tap any special skills they might 
	have. Some parents can serve as public speakers representing the agency – 
	their testimony will go a long way with many audiences. Practice wisdom from 
	group work practice advises that if you want someone to be more involved in 
	a group, give them a job to do or a role to fill. By including parents in a 
	meaningful way in which they can give to the agency as well as receive 
	services from it, they become persons with responsibility, not merely 
	clients to be served.
 
		- Social workers and child care workers can collaborate on one or more 
	visits to the family’s home. We better identify with people when we see 
	where they live, and with what they are living. Child care workers thus 
	develop a greater appreciation for the family’s values and background. The 
	team of social worker, child care worker, and family is also underscored by 
	their involvement in one another’s spheres of activity.
 
		- For parents too geographically distant or physically ill to be this 
	active in the agency’s daily activities, the child care worker needs to make 
	frequent phone contact, minimally once a week. Share day-to-day happenings 
	and problems as well as successes. This contact reassures parents that their 
	child is being well cared for and that they are still involved even if at a 
	distance. The telephone contact is also used to include parents in planning 
	and decision making, and extended conference calls can supplement less 
	frequent sessions.
 
		- When the family is involved in counseling with the social worker, 
	include the child care worker as a team member or “co-therapist.” The child 
	care workers thus learn about the family and their dynamics and goals, can 
	share their expertise in working with the child, and can include life in the 
	cottage in any intervention plans that develop. The parents and child also 
	understand more clearly the professional role of the child care worker. The 
	child care worker also can avoid being stuck in the role of child advocate. 
	Because of the child care worker’s intense involvement with the child, the 
	social worker may need to help the child care worker to move back and forth 
	in siding with parents and child so that both parents and child feel the 
	child care worker’s support and understanding. In turn, the child care 
	worker can enrich the social worker’s knowledge about the family’s dynamics 
	from their first-hand observations and interventions with family and child.
		
 
	
	References
	Fanshel, D, and Shin, E. B. (1978) Children in foster care: A 
	longitudinal investigation. New York: Columbia University Press
	Finkelstein, N. E. (1981) Family centered group care – The children's 
	institution, from a living center to a center for change. In Malucio, A. N. 
	and Sinanoglu, P. A. (Eds.) The challenge of partnership: Working with 
	parents of children in foster care. New York: Child Welfare League of 
	America, pp. 89-105
	Keith-Lucas, A. and Sanford, C. W. (1977) Group 
	child care as a family service. Chapel Hill: University of North 
	Carolina
	Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. 
	Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
	Simmons, G; Gumpert, J. & Rothman, 
	B. (1973). Natural Parents as Partners in Child Care Placement. Social 
	Casework 54, 224-232
	Whittaker, J.K. (1981). Family involvement in 
	residential treatment: A support system for parents. In Malucio, A. N. and 
	Sinanoglu, P. A. (Eds.) The challenge of partnership: Working with 
	parents of children in foster care. New York: Child Welfare League of 
	America, pp. 67-88.
	
	Richmond Garland, D. S. (1987) Residential Child Care 
	Workers as Primary Agents of Family Intervention.
Child and Youth Care 
	Quarterly. Vol.16 No.1 pp. 27-29