The social work supervisor: Supervision in community, day care and 
	residential settings
	Allan Brown and Iain Bourne
	Supervision is the primary means by which an agency-designated supervisor 
	enables staff, individually, and collectively; and ensures standards of 
	practice. The aim is to enable the supervisee(s) to carry out their work, as 
	stated in their job specification, as effectively as possible. Regular 
	arranged meetings between supervisor and supervisee(s) form the core of the 
	process by which the supervisory task is carried out. The supervisee is an 
	active participant in this interactional process.
	There are several points arising from our definition that we think merit 
	further discussion:
	
		- When we refer to supervision we are talking about a relationship 
	between one person, a supervisor, and another, a supervisee. The supervisor 
	has been given authority by their employer to supervise one or more 
	supervisees who are employees accountable to her or him for their agency 
	work. The concept of accountability is less straightforward and presents 
	some possible difficulties. Some would argue – with a degree of support from 
	the new community care legislation – that the worker’s first accountability 
	is to the service user or ‘client’. Others would say that the first 
	accountability of a professional worker is to their profession, and yet 
	others would say that the first accountability is to oneself. We do not 
	disagree with any of these points about the multifaceted nature of 
	accountability; we only confirm that the above statement is referring to 
	agency accountability.
 
		- In our use of the terms enable and ensure we are attempting to capture 
	the dual nature of supervision, which carries the responsibility both to 
	ensure that agency policy is implemented – which implies a controlling 
	function – and a parallel responsibility to enable supervisees to work to 
	the best of their ability, implying a person-centred caring function. We 
	consider both these functions to be equally important and inextricably 
	related to one another in supervision. As in the parallel process of work 
	with service users in a statutory setting, there are often pressures to be 
	either the agency controller who pays scant attention to caring and 
	empowering, or the caring consultant/counsellor who abdicates the authority 
	vested in the role of supervisor. In a task-orientated, budget-dominated 
	climate, we think the greater risk is the downplaying of the enabling, 
	caring function of supervision.
 
		- The reference to individually and collectively is included to emphasise the centrality of the team or staff group in social work and 
	community care. Whilst much of the discussion here will refer to the 
	one-to-one relationship of supervisor and supervisee, this almost always 
	takes place in, and needs to take account of, a team or work group context. 
	In residential and day care settings this team dimension is an ever-present 
	reality, and in fieldwork the days of private individualised relationships, 
	whether with users or colleagues, are becoming a thing of the past. Thus an 
	essential task of a supervisor is to develop a team and group ethos. This 
	may be achieved directly through various group events, including for example 
	team meetings, away days and group supervision (see Chapters 8 and 9), and 
	indirectly through taking a contextual approach in supervision to the work 
	undertaken by each individual.
 
		- Arguably the most important point to emphasise is the overall aim of 
	supervision as being the provision of the best possible service to the users 
	of personal social services. This apparently obvious fact needs stressing 
	because it so often gets lost sight of in supervision when agency politics, 
	interpersonal conflicts, personal ambition, games playing, supervisor and 
	supervisee preoccupations and other diversions become the main part of 
	supervision sessions. These dynamics are all normal and ubiquitous, and will 
	be examined in some detail later in the book. The point to hold on to from 
	the beginning, and continuously, when thinking about supervision is that the 
	whole rationale for the agency and its organisational apparatus is to 
	provide a first-class service for people who need it (or in some cases are 
	required to have it, in order that they or others may be protected from 
	harm).
 
		- We need to state right from the beginning that we regard supervision 
	as an interactional process in which the supervisee is an active 
	participant. In Chapter 5 we look at the developmental stages in supervision 
	and the changing needs and relationship according to the supervisee’s level 
	of experience and expertise. However, even the most inexperienced supervisee 
	needs to develop – and be helped to develop – the skills and confidence to 
	be proactive in their approach to supervision.
 
		- The final point arising from our statement on supervision refers to 
	supervision taking place primarily in formally arranged regular meetings. 
	The issue here is whether supervision is a specific event, namely the 
	supervision session, or a process, where something occurs continuously 
	between supervisor and supervisee(s) in their day-to-day work – or both. We 
	have had some protracted discussions between us on this issue and, in 
	particular, where to put the boundary around supervision; these have also 
	been discussions about setting the parameters of this book. It would clearly 
	be absurd to restrict our notion of supervision to the single event of the 
	formal supervision session, when so much of the agenda in supervision 
	overlaps with other events and contacts between supervisor and supervisee, 
	many of an informal or crisis nature, and we have no wish to do so. On the 
	other hand it seems important, as stated earlier, to distinguish supervision 
	from other aspects of management and from the multifarious tasks of those 
	who have supervisory responsibilities. 
 
	
	References
Chamberlain, D.B. (1999). Life in the 
	womb: dangers and opportunities. Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal 
	Psychology and Health, 14(1-2), 65-83. 
	Fadiman, J., & Frager, R. 
	(2002). Personality and personal growth fifth edition. New Jersey: 
	Pearson Education, Inc.
	Neidra, A. & Belfanti, M. (n.d.) 
	Relationships and you. Retrieved March 20, 2004
	
	Brown, A. and Bourne, I. (1996). The social work 
	supervisor: Supervision in community, day care and residential settings.
	Buckingham: Open University Press. pp.9-11