Listen to thisAfter more than a decade of relative neglect, self-concept is enjoying renewed popularity and attention by both researchers and practitioners. There is growing awareness that of all the perceptions we experience in the course of living, none has more profound significance than the perceptions we hold regarding our own personal existence “our concept of who we are and how we fit into the world.
Self-concept may be defined as the totality of a complex, organized, and dynamic system of learned beliefs, attitudes and opinions that each person holds to be true about his or her personal existence. Self-concept is different from self-esteem (feelings of personal worth and level of satisfaction regarding one’s self) or self-report (what a person is willing and able to disclose). Fromm (1956) was as beautifully clear as anyone when he described self-concept as “life being aware of itself.”
Brief history of self-concept theory
A milestone in human reflection about the non-physical inner self came
in 1644, when Rene Descartes wrote Principles of Philosophy.
Descartes proposed that doubt was a principal tool of disciplined
inquiry, yet he could not doubt that he doubted. He reasoned that if he
doubted, he was thinking, and therefore he must exist. Thus existence
depended upon perception.
A second milestone in the development of self-concept theory was the writing of Sigmund Freud (1900) who gave us new understanding of the importance of internal mental processes. While Freud and many of his followers hesitated to make self-concept a primary psychological unit in their theories, Freud's daughter Anna (1946) gave central importance to ego development and self-interpretation.
Self-concept theory has always had a strong influence on the emerging profession of counseling. Prescott Lecky (1945) contributed the notion that self-consistency is a primary motivating force in human behavior. Raimy (1948) introduced measures of self-concept in counseling interviews and argued that psychotherapy is basically a process of altering the ways that individuals see themselves.
By far the most influential and eloquent voice in self-concept theory was that of Carl Rogers (1947) who introduced an entire system of helping built around the importance of the self. In Rogers” view, the self is the central ingredient in human personality and personal adjustment. Rogers described the self as a social product, developing out of interpersonal relationships and striving for consistency. He maintained that there is a basic human need for positive regard both from others and from oneself. He also believed that in every person there is a tendency towards self-actualization and development so long as this is permitted and encouraged by an inviting environment (Purkey & Schmidt, 1987).
While most self-concept theorists continued to write and conduct research during the 1970’s and 1980–s, general interest in self-concept declined. In a recent article explaining the likely causes for the decline of “humanistic” education, Patterson (1987) presents reasons for the decline of interest in self-concept as well. He offers four likely causes:
1. A cornucopia of contrived games, gimmicks, and techniques that were introduced and controlled by unprepared professionals.
2. A national mood of “back to basics” in education prevailed where concern for the emotional needs of students was viewed as inimical to academic excellence.
3. Poor judgment by counselors and teachers in selecting suitable materials for values clarification programs resulted in public opposition to any attempt to introduce values in school.
4. Strong opposition by those who objected to any consideration of personal development of students because they believed it to be secular humanism and, therefore, an effort to undermine religion.
Fortunately, there is a new awareness on the part of both the public and professionals that self-concept cannot be ignored if we are to successfully address such nagging problems as drug and alcohol abuse, drop-out rates, dysfunctional families, and other concerns. In addition to this growing awareness, new ways are being developed to strengthen self-concepts. For example, research by cognitive theorists (McAdam, 1986; Ryan, Short and Weed, 1986) are demonstrating that negative self-talk leads to irrational thinking regarding oneself and the world.
Some basic assumptions regarding
self-concept
Many of the successes and failures that people experience in many areas
of life are closely related to the ways that they have learned to view
themselves and their relationships with others. It is also becoming
clear that self-concept has at least three major qualities of interest
to counselors: (1) it is learned, (2) it is organized, and (3) it is
dynamic. Each of these qualities, with corollaries, follow.
Self-concept is learned. As far as we know, no one is born with a self-concept. It gradually emerges in the early months of life and is shaped and reshaped through repeated perceived experiences, particularly with significant others. The fact that self-concept is learned has some important implications:
Because self-concept does not appear to be instinctive, but is a social product developed through experience, it possesses relatively boundless potential for development and actualization.
Because of previous experiences and present perceptions, individuals may perceive themselves in ways different from the ways others see them.
Individuals perceive different aspects of themselves at different times with varying degrees of clarity. Therefore, inner focusing is a valuable tool for counseling.
Any experience which is inconsistent with one’s self-concept may be perceived as a threat, and the more of these experiences there are, the more rigidly self-concept is organized to maintain and protect itself. When a person is unable to get rid of perceived inconsistencies, emotional problems arise.
Faulty thinking patterns, such as dichotomous reasoning (dividing everything in terms of opposites or extremes) or overgeneralizing (making sweeping conclusions based on little information) create negative interpretations of oneself.
Self-Concept is organized. Most researchers agree that self-concept has a generally stable quality that is characterized by orderliness and harmony. Each person maintains countless perceptions regarding one’s personal existence, and each perception is orchestrated with all the others. It is this generally stable and organized quality of self-concept that gives consistency to the personality. This organized quality of self-concept has corollaries.
Self-concept requires consistency, stability, and tends to resist change. If self-concept changed readily, the individual would lack a consistent and dependable personality.
The more central a particular belief is to one’s self-concept, the more resistant one is to changing that belief.
At the heart of self-concept is the self-as-doer, the “I,” which is distinct from the self-as-object, the various “me–s.” This allows the person to reflect on past events, analyze present perceptions, and shape future experiences.
Basic perceptions of oneself are quite stable, so change takes time. Rome was not built in a day, and neither is self-concept.
Perceived success and failure impact on self-concept. Failure in a highly regarded area lowers evaluations in all other areas as well. Success in a prized area raises evaluations in other seemingly unrelated areas.
Self-Concept is dynamic. To understand the active nature of self-concept, it helps to imagine it as a gyrocompass: a continuously active system that dependably points to the “true north” of a person's perceived existence. This guidance system not only shapes the ways a person views oneself, others, and the world, but it also serves to direct action and enables each person to take a consistent “stance” in life. Rather than viewing self-concept as the cause of behavior, it is better understood as the gyrocompass of human personality, providing consistency in personality and direction for behavior. The dynamic quality of self-concept also carries corollaries.
The world and the things in it are not just perceived; they are perceived in relation to one’s self-concept.
Self-concept development is a continuous process. In the healthy personality there is constant assimilation of new ideas and expulsion of old ideas throughout life.
Individuals strive to behave in ways that are in keeping with their self-concepts, no matter how helpful or hurtful to oneself or others.
Self-concept usually takes precedence over the physical body. Individuals will often sacrifice physical comfort and safety for emotional satisfaction.
Self-concept continuously guards itself against loss of self-esteem, for it is this loss that produces feelings of anxiety.
If self-concept must constantly defend itself from assault, growth opportunities are limited.
Summary
This brief overview of self-concept theory has focused on describing the
ways people organize and interpret their inner world of personal
existence. The beginnings of self-concept theory and its recent history
have been discussed. Three major qualities of self-concept “that it is:
(1) learned, (2) organized, and (3) dynamic “have been presented.
Individuals have within themselves relatively boundless potential for
developing a positive and realistic self-concept. This potential can be
realized by people, places, policies, programs, and processes that are
intentionally designed to invite the realization of this potential.
References
Freud, S. (1900). The interpretation of dreams. In the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. London. The Hogarth Press, 1962.
Fromm, E. (1956). The art of loving. New York. Harper and Row.
Hamachek, D. E. (1978). Encounters with the self (2nd ed.). New York. Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Jourard, S. (1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York. Wiley-Interscience.
Lecky, P. (1945). Self-consistency: A theory of personality. New York. Island Press.
McAdam, E. K. (1986). Cognitive behavior therapy and its application with adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 9. pp. 1-15.
Patterson, C. H. (1961). The self in recent Rogerian theory. Journal of Individual Psychology, 17. pp.5-11.
Purkey, W. W., & Schmidt, J. (1987). The inviting relationship: An expanded perspective for professional counseling. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Raimy, V. C. (1948). Self-reference in counseling interviews. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12. pp. 153-163.
Rogers, C. R. (1947). Some observations on the organization of personality. American Psychologist, 2. pp. 358-368.
Ryan, E. B., Short, E. J. and Weed, K. A. (1986). The role of cognitive strategy training in improving the academic performance of learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19. pp. 521-529.
This feature is an ERIC Digest and is in the public domain
