There are compelling reasons to promote the involvement of fathers in their children’s lives: the value of their positive influence, their effectiveness in increasing children’s academic achievement, and the importance of their financial support (Nord, Brimhall and West, 1997). Teenage and young adult males may need extra help to assume the full fatherhood role, but most, if aided, will work hard to be successful parents. Public interest in fostering fathers’ involvement is increasing because of the recognized benefits of fathers’ contributions to their families. In fact, the National Education Goals contain a family involvement mandate. The Federal Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunities Reconciliation Act of 1996 requires states to determine paternity for 90 percent of children receiving assistance, but it also provides for family social and employment services. Indeed, the National Governors’ Association recommends comprehensive statewide policies governing all aspects of teenage parenting (Stebbins, 1997).
Communities, frequently with government and school assistance, can implement programs which help youth develop into caring and responsible fathers. Father programs can be independent or components of programs designed for families, teen mothers, or young men generally. This digest briefly describes program components shown to be most effective.
Special issues for young fathers
Because teenage fathers almost never plan pregnancies, their initial reactions may be denial, fear, and a desire to escape. Young fathers frequently face family rejection, barriers to contact with child and mother, a lack of ways to contribute financially, and an inability to envision future achievements enabling them to function effectively as a father. They also may believe that they are simply unwelcome and inadequate as parents (Batten and Stowell, 1996; Knitzer and Bernard, 1997). Their emotional state is further complicated by the need to reconcile the contradictory roles of adolescent and father and assume the responsibilities of adulthood before they are sufficiently mature (Kahn and Bolton, 1986).
Effective programs take account of ethnic differences and use culturally-sensitive outreach strategies and curriculum. Young fathers may need to be helped to understand that the structure of the families of their birth, heavily influenced by historical ethnic traditions and experience, may not be workable in the U.S. today. For example, Latinos, who are most responsive to warm, personal, informal contact — in their native language, if appropriate — need to consider whether an adequate family income can result from traditional gender role divisions. African Americans may feel hopeless and powerless, based on past treatment of blacks in the U.S., and may mistrust both personal counseling and agents of authority (Kiselica, 1995).
Programs also need to tailor their curriculum to the local socioeconomic climate. Urban youth, for example, need special employment counseling, given the exodus of entry-level jobs.
Program components
Goals and perspectives
Successful 
		programs help young fathers develop the behaviors and assume the 
		responsibilities common to committed parents by providing them with 
		emotional support and useful services. Reflecting the current position 
		of the Federal government, program goals indicate a shift in the 
		orientation of many agencies: from solely attempting to secure child 
		support payments to helping youth acquire fatherhood skills and increase 
		their earning ability. Programs now seek to demonstrate that there are 
		benefits to accepting the responsibilities of fatherhood as well as 
		obligations (Levine, 1993; N. Tift, Fatherhood Initiative, personal 
		communication, February 1999). 
Effective counselors acknowledge the limitations of adolescent attitudes and economic realities. Possibly, they must transcend their own negative view of young fathers, based on stereotypes: they are “super studs” with only fleeting relationships with the mother, financially irresponsible, and uninterested in fatherhood (Kiselica, 1995).
Community outreach
Program 
		recruiters assume that fathers want to be involved. To find prospective 
		participants, they urge mothers to supply names, encourage the youth’s 
		parents to recruit him, and go to neighborhood places where youth 
		congregate (e.g., basketball courts). Fathers already involved with 
		their children are recruited at birthing centers, clinics, and 
		preschools. 
To entice youth to enroll, recruiters talk about the benefits of the program, give fathers practical help at the outset, and arrange attractive, structured father-child activities. Promises of other services also help fathers to enroll: legal advice about paternity issues, empowering information about the birth process and meeting infant needs, sex education counseling and personal medical care, and mediation that leads to successful co-parenting. Offering new fathers a safe and supportive place to talk about their children and other concerns, and suggesting that program participation may give them added credibility with their children’ mothers, are other recruitment strategies (Batten and Stowell, 1996; Kiselica, 1995; Simms, 1998).
Establishing trust in the program helps fathers overcome their possible fear of authority and legal responsibilities, and negative and fatalistic beliefs (Kahn and Bolton, 1986). Thus, recruiters are honest and clear about all the ways a child benefits from having an involved father and also about how hard, but uniquely satisfying, fathering is. It is beneficial for the outreach worker to share, or be familiar with, the recruit’s cultural background. One effective strategy is for the first (if not all) contact to be made by another teen father who can speak from experience. Older men who have overcome the difficulties of early parenthood also recruit effectively (Tift, personal communication, February 1999; Turning, n.d.).
Service provision
Young father 
		programs can offer many different services, ranging from on-site support 
		to referrals (i.e., legal aid, GED courses, job training). Some offer 
		only group activities; others, one-on-one mentoring. Some programs 
		function as a liaison between fathers and government agencies to help 
		men both meet their financial obligations and become eligible for public 
		services under the 1996 Federal Act (Stebbins, 1997). The Institute for 
		Responsible Fatherhood and Family Revitalization, however, is opposed to 
		accepting public assistance and focuses on developing self-reliance 
		(Turning, n.d.). One local YWCA, even produced a handbook for fathers to 
		use, either with the program or as a stand-alone resource (Maybury, 
		1991).
Education
It is crucial to help fathers get as much 
		education as possible. Thus, programs may need to act as advocates if 
		school personnel encourage them to leave. If fathers want to drop out of 
		school, counselors can foster persistence by building fathers’ 
		confidence that they can succeed, helping them get a job that will not 
		interfere with schoolwork, and securing tutoring. Fathers who have 
		already dropped out are referred to GED programs. High school graduates 
		are encouraged to enroll in higher education as a way of increasing 
		their long-term career and economic prospects and helping them model 
		educational achievement for their children (Kiselica, 1995). 
Parenting education
As they explain why a father’s involvement is 
		crucial to a child’s development, counselors also teach how fathers can 
		help their children develop cognitively, socioemotionally, and 
		physically. Equally important, they help fathers develop strategies for 
		controlling their anger when their children misbehave and for 
		constructively disciplining the children. Many audiovisual aids are 
		available to demonstrate good fatherhood practices (Kiselica, 1995). 
Career development
Programs can help fathers find short-term 
		employment to meet their child support obligations; make long-range 
		career plans; and enroll in training programs, such as the Federal Job 
		Opportunities and Basic Skills Training. It may be necessary to provide 
		a crash course in job-seeking and job-training skills. Fathers of color 
		may need help in overcoming negative attitudes which, while based on 
		historical experience, impede their chances for employment success now 
		(Kiselica, 1995). 
Counseling
Counselors help youth clarify their 
		feelings about impending fatherhood and assuming adult responsibilities 
		early. To help fathers feel less isolated, they provide a place for 
		sharing feelings, asking questions, and identifying commonalities within 
		the group. Counselors also help them develop a mature definition of 
		masculinity so they can enjoy a healthy relationship with a woman and 
		defer fathering additional children (Kiselica, 1995; Tift, personal 
		communication, February 1999). 
School strategies for fathers
Many 
		schools have comprehensive programs for pregnant and parenting females, 
		in which they encourage mothers to identify and involve fathers in their 
		children’s lives and to recruit them for father programs. They may 
		invite fathers to some programs for mothers. 
Some schools also 
		implement and contribute to programs for fathers. They enable fathers to 
		continue their general education, offer them parenting courses, and 
		facilitate their efforts to find part-time work and make career plans.
		
Kiselica (1995) has identified several schools and districts with 
		programs for both parents. The Booker T. Washington Alternative School 
		(Terre Haute, IN) permits parents to finish their education, access 
		low-cost child care services, and hold jobs. The Jefferson County Public 
		Schools’ Teen Parent Program (KY) identifies and involves fathers 
		prenatally, and helps them set and realize goals. The New Futures School 
		(Albuquerque, NM) is a collaboration among education and social service 
		agencies and the University of New Mexico Medical School that provides 
		parents with a range of services. The Boulder Valley Schools Teen 
		Parenting Program (CO) also offers services for both parents 
		(Parmerlee-Greiner, 1992). 
Conclusion
The benefits to children, families, and society of the commitment of fathers are undisputed. Therefore, it is worth the time and effort of schools and community organizations to implement programs for young fathers that will enable them to develop into responsible adults, meet their obligations, and create a generation of well-nurtured and effectively educated children.
References
Batten, S.T., and Stowell, B.G. (1996). School-based programs for adolescent parents and their young children. Bala Cynwid, PA. Center for Assessment and Policy Development.
Kahn, J.S., and Bolton, F. G., Jr. (1986). Clinical issues in adolescent fatherhood. In A.B. Elster and M.E. Lamb. Adolescent fatherhood. Hillsdale, NJ. Erlbaum.
Kiselica, M.S. (1995). Multicultural 
		counseling with teenage fathers: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA. 
		Sage. 
Levine, J.A. (1993). Getting men involved: Strategies for 
		early childhood programs. New York. Families and Work Institute. (ED 388 
		399) 
Maybury, K.K. (1991). Teen father handbook for teen fathers and teen fathers-to-be. Sacramento, CA. Sacramento YWCA. (ED 334 334)
Knitzer, J., and Bernard, S. (1997). Map and track: State initiatives to encourage responsible fatherhood. New York. National Center for Children in Poverty. (ED 410 020)
Nord, C.W., Brimhall, D.A., & West, J. (1997, October). Fathers’ involvement in their children’s schools. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (ED 409 125)
Parmerlee-Greiner, G. (1992). 
		Boulder Valley Schools Teen Parenting Program. Boulder. Fairview High 
		School. (ED 347 255) 
Simms, D. (1998, Fall). Reflection on program 
		development for young fathers. The Collaborator: Newsletter of the 
		National Practitioners Network for Fathers and Families, 4, 3, pp. 6-7.
		
Stebbins, H. (1997). Serving teen parents in a welfare reform environment. Washington, DC. National Governors’ Association. (ED 414 018).
Turning the hearts of fathers. (n.d.). Washington, DC. Institute for Responsible Fatherhood and Family Revitalization
This feature is from an ERIC Digest and is in the public domain.